What should the mentality on the line be?

In this blogger's opinion, the thing holding back the Ohio State football team from competing against the better teams it has faced the last couple years has been the play of the offensive line. Lord knows I've written enough about it the last couple months, and that all my prognostications about the upcoming season - the optimistic ones at least - come with a single, glaring caveat: that the play of the offensive line must improve. A lot. There are many different reasons people have tossed out for line's struggles: conditioning, scheme, "heart" (or whatever you want to call it), but also, the line's "attitude".
Chris Spielman has long been one of my favorite Buckeyes to watch, but also to listen to. Last year, in the Ohio game, he acted as sideline reporter for the ESPN braodcast. As Ohio State got consistently manhandled in the trenches, he said watching the line was like watching a pillow fight. And it's true; against even the patsiest of patsies on the schedule, Ohio State's line alternated between good and not-so-good for four frustrating quarters. The next day on his radio show, Spielman said the line was "playing pattycake", and he contrasted it with the USC line, which, in his words, doesn't "play nice".
Were this criticism to come from anyone but Spielman, I'd take it with a grain of salt; I tend to ignore explanations that don't boil down to technique, philosophy and scheme, because I feel like I don't learn anything from them. They just feel like newspaper column fodder for Scout/Rivals types to get all fired up about. But since it was Spielman, this criticism was different. The old cliché states that football is a mental game, and, never having actually played it, but having watched it for years, I'd have to agree. But what exactly is the menality went want in our offensive line? Alex Boone spent three years trying to get this line fired up, and not doing a very good job, it seems. Kirk Barton, for three years, did an adequate job, but in two of his teams' biggest games - the twin national title beatdowns - he, and the rest of unit, looked lost. For Barton, it's especially odd, considering he held talented Texas pass rusher Bryan Robison and Michigan's Lamarr Woodley, in check for the two other "big games" of 2006. Now, I already told you where leadership on this line will likely come from; Boren and Brewster seem to have it in spades. The question is, what sort of mentality should the coaches seek to foster? It seems that ALEX BOONE RAGE, the aggressive, take-no-prisoners 'tude the left tackle tried to bring to the '06 and '07 lines largely fizzled out in '08, and it makes you wonder if the transition from Barton to Boone as the group spokesman had anything to do with it. With talk of Boren fighting his own teammates in practice, it seems that the attitude at the top won't be changing all that much. If that's the case, how much of a change can we expect? We now know that position shuffling is still taking place; Cordle has moved back inside apparently, with Shugarts and Adams holding down the two tackle spots for now; so it's clear that coaches didn't feel they had a cohesive unit, at least in its spring practice iteration. I, for one, expect the line to be better than it was in 2008 - there's nowhere to go but up - but I just can't be too sure where the ceiling is.
Am I reading too much into all of this? Thoughts?
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
first of all
Alex Boone was a lazy piece of shit on the field and he got his ass kicked in every big game. I remember watching the replay of that Ohio game and he took so many plays off you’d think he was doing a Shaun Rogers impression. He wasn’t very well-liked according to some of my friends on the team, mainly because he was a huge douchebag to everyone. Anyway…
The entire o-line from 2008 was good, but they have Beanie and Pryor to thank for making them look much better than they actually were (it didn’t help that we ran the most predictable offense known to man). Aside from Boone, I’d have each one of those guys back in a heartbeat. That being said, I’m glad they’re gone because these new guys are going to allow for more liberal playcalling—a luxury we didn’t have last year.
The mentality of an o-lineman is simple—know your scheme, don’t get beat, finish the play. The identity of this offensive line is the bigger question.
I ran into Mr. Bucknuts over the weekend and we talked Buckeye football for about 20 minutes. He seems to think this year’s line will be faster and more athletic so there’s a better chance we’ll spread the field more frequently. That’s not to say they won’t come out on first and 10 on the 20 in the Power I and pound it up the gut—they will… you know they will… This line will be able to handle that just as well.
That’s their identity—big and strong enough to get a positive push, but quick and athletic enough to handle a pass rush out of the spread. It’s hard to say whether this line will be better than last year’s because they don’t have Beanie, but they will be more versatile and faster. Their mentality should be to ignore what happened last year and make this their team.
"The entire line from '08 was good"
Heh. Heh. Good one, man. Oh, you’re serious?
… yeah, gonna have to disagree with you there. As Dave pointed out, Browning was simply not a good player last year, and when he was anything better than mediocre, he was probably holding. Rehring just seemed to sorta flop around and do nothing when on the field, and he and Person both looked lost more often than not. Only Boone, Cordle and Brewster put together more than two or three consistent games. And as you said, against the better teams, Boone didn’t look to hot. But then again, neither did anyone else.
And perhaps it’s just me, but in re-watching the constant replays from last year on the BTN, Brewster looked and played like the best lineman Ohio State had all season. I expect big, big things from him and Boren this year.
www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com
GrooveLeg, what team were you watching last year?
“The entire o-line from 2008 was good”… Umm, no, they were not. Browning was probably the worst excuse for a tackle I have ever seen in my life (nothing against him personally, I hope he plays better as a Guard, but still…). My 18 month old nephew has a quicker first step, and can move better laterally, then Browning can.
I’m not trying to start a gay-argument-in-the-comments-section-of-an article-because-I’m-a-douche-bag with you, but you are the first person I have ever seen refer to the buckeyes offensive line as anything better then awful.
Our O-line got man-handled by Purdue. They were the 93rd worst defense against the rush last year, and we only averaged 3 yards per carry against them. We didn’t even score an offensive touchdown in that game…AGAINST PUR-FREAKING-DUE!!! That was a direct result of the ineffective play up front…

by 





