Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

What's the worst that can happen?*

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/06Xm9nZ11EdOn/340x.jpg

 

On three separate occasions in the last few weeks, people who've been keeping track of my game previews have asked me: barring a Pryor injury, what's the absolute worst-case scenario for Ohio State this season? Considering a Pryor injury is the worst case scenario, I found this question a bit difficult to ask. So that asterisk? It's because this is a prediction done assuming Pryor is in the line-up for each game. So I figured that instead of replying to those e-mails directly with the same answer, I'd write up my honest epinion. The simple answer is that, with the talent on hand, Ohio State's worst case scenario barring a Pryor injury is still probably the Alamo bowl. This schedule is sneaky-tough, but talent-on-talent, there's only one team that "should" beat Ohio State, and that's USC. Of course, talent-on-talent, the only team USC wouldn't beat mercilessly is Florida, but... I digress. A more in-depth answer to this mindboggling question comes after the break.

Star-divide

First thing first, the scale of win/loss likelihood:

Likely loss: less than 20 percent chance of Ohio State winning

Probable loss: between 20 and 45 percent chance of Ohio State winning

Toss-up: 46-54 percent chance of Ohio State winning

Probable win: 54-75 percent chance of Ohio State winning

Likely win: 75-99 percent chance of Ohio State winning

Guaranteed win: If Ohio State loses, I will hang myself and demand my family post pictures of it on the internet for all to see.

Yes, this system is arbitrary and flawed. It's the hard offseason. Get over yourself.

Navy

Record vs. final Top 25 last 5 years: 0-4

Record vs. opponents with a winning record last 5 years: 6-15

At first blush, it's: a second-half-awakening-of-the-offense-fueled blowout win.

My abbreviated thoughts: As I asserted in the preview, Navy is one of the most difficult teams Ohio State could face when breaking in two new linebackers. If the play of the linebackers isn't anything more than average, this game won't be decided until the fourth quarter.

So, it's a: Likely win. Worst-case-scenario Ohio State is 1-0 on the season.

USC

Record vs final Top 25 last 5 years: 18-4

Record vs. winning opponents last 5 years: 28-5

At first blush, it's: Yet another frustrating big game loss

My abbreviated thoughts: USC's record against top-25 opponents shows that they don't fuck around. Those four losses are to Texas, Oregon State, Oregon (with sophomore back-up Mark Sanchez starting over the injured John David Booty), and Oregon State again. Solution: relocate to Oregon.

So, it's a:  Likely loss. The only one on the schedule, in my estimation. Theoretical worst-case-scenario Ohio State is 1-1 on the season.

Toledo

Record vs final Top 25 last 5 years: 0-1, that one loss being a 45-13 mushroom-printing at the hands of Kansas

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 7-18

At first blush, it's: Another blowout with a slow start

My abbreviated thoughts: Toledo simply doesn't matchup at all against top competition. Yeah, yeah, lolMichigan and all that, but if Ohio State plays as badly as Michigan did against Toledo, it deserves to lose..

So it's a: Guaranteed win, one of just three on the entire schedule. Theoretical worst-case-scenario Ohio State is now 2-1 on the season.

Illinois

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 3-17

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years:  7-27

At first blush, it's:  A scary, close game, with a surprising amount of points scored. Ohio State should win in the end after Illinois wears out. *crosses fingers*

My abbreviated thoughts: Illinois' record vs. top-25 and winning opponents may seem laughable, but those numbers are hurt by the latter years of the Turner era and Ron Zook's disastrous first season. However, Illinois went from 5-3 against opponents with a winning record in 2007 to a shocking 1-7 against winners in '08.

So it's a: Toss-up. I mean it, guys. Illinois was bad last year; I will not argue this. But Ron Zook's offenses have found consistent success against Jim Heacock's defenses. Since this is a worst-case scenario, chalk the Illini up for another close win in Columbus and a 2-2 start to a worst-case 2009.

Indiana

 

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 0-12

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 3-19

At first blush, it's:  A start-to-finish blowout

My abbreviated thoughts: The only real win of note for Indiana the last five years was its inexplicable 21-19 W over Northwestern just last year. Outside of that, it's what you'd expect from Indiana. Ohio State shouldn't have any trouble putting them away.

So it's a: Guaranteed win. This theoretical Buckeye squad is 3-2 on the season.

Wisconsin

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 5-12

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 14-15

At first blush, it's: Closer than you might think.

My abbreviated thoughts: Bret Bielema is yet another Big Ten coach who seems to be losing control of his team, but his offenses still do fairly well against Ohio State defenses. Nevertheless, this is a game Ohio State should win.

So it's a: Toss-up. The Badgers always play us tough, even if they tend to fade in the 4th quarter. I'm calling it a close win in a worst-case scenario. Theoretical worst-case scenario Ohio State moves to 4-2 on the season. 

Purdue

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 1-17

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 5-30

At first blush, it's: a 10-14 point win over a younger team with a depleted roster.

My abbreviated thoughts: Purdue has played us fairly close two years running, and Purdue's only win against a top-25 opponent in the last five years was against Ohio State. As I said in the preview, Purdue' absolutely must force turnovers to win, and that's only going to work if it can limit Ohio State's offense again, and actually score touchdowns in the red zone.

So it's a: Probable win. If a toss-up is 50/50, this one is 60/40. I actually feel a little arrogant not chalking this one up as a toss-up, because Purdue's history of playing us close is worrisome, to say the least. Your theoretical, worst-case scenario Ohio State team (with Pryor under center) is 5-2 on the season.

Minnesota

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 0-17

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 4-29

At first blush, it's: A similar game to last year's; roughly as close as the scoreboard indicates at the end of the day. A win, barring catastrophe.

My abbreviated thoughts: It's a home game against a team breaking in a new offensive system with players equipped to play one that's a little more spready.

So it's a: Likely win, and edging toward guaranteed.

New Mexico State

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 0-6

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 3-25

At first blush, it's: A start-to-finish blowout.

My abbreviated thoughts: Even in the genuine worst case scenario - i.e. Pryor's knees exploding - this is a win. That's how bad New Mexico State is.

So it's a: Guaran-damn-teed, write-it-down, seal-it-up, lovingly-wrap-it-in-bubble-paper win. The Ohio State team of your almost-worst nightmares is now a respectable 7-2 on the season.

Penn State

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 8-13

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 17-17

At first blush, it's: A close game that could go either way.

My abbreviated thoughts: The series of late is in interesting one; you've got two low-scoring Penn State defensive masterpiece wins that bookend two decisive Ohio State blowouts. The all-time series is, as I'm sure you've all been reminded countless times by Penn State fans, fairly even. This decade, however, it's a bit of a different story:

10/25/2008 vs. *Penn State (11-2) L 6 13
10/27/2007 @ *Penn State (9-4) W 37 17
9/23/2006 vs. *Penn State (9-4) W 28 6
10/8/2005 @ *Penn State (11-1) L 10 17
10/30/2004 vs. *Penn State (4-7) W 21 10
11/1/2003 @ *Penn State (3-9) W 21 20
10/26/2002 vs. *Penn State (9-4) W 13 7
10/27/2001 @ *Penn State (5-6) L 27 29
9/23/2000 vs. *Penn State (5-7) W 45 6

 

But, neverthless, outside of 2000, 2006 and 2007, the games have been close, and I expect 2009 to be no different, worst case scenario or not.

So it's a: Toss-up. As this is a worst-case scenario, let's say Ohio State drops this one and falls to 7-3 on the season.

Iowa

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 6-10

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 16-18

At first blush, it's: Another close game, regardless of the worst-case scenario outlook.

My abbreviated thoughts: Ohio State's last two games against the Hawkeyes were ugly blowouts, sure, but as you'll see in the preview, Iowa has a fighting chance in this one, and it's all dependent on the development of one Jewel Hampton.

So it's a: Toss-up. Given that so far, Ohio State has only lost one seemingly out-of-nowhere game in this evaluation in Illinois, I'm going to give this one to the Hawkeyes. That puts the Buckeyes at 7-4 on the theoretical season.

Michigan

Record vs final top 25 last 5 years: 7-15

Record vs winning opponents last 5 years: 19-19

At first blush, it's: A 10-14 point win after a slow start against an improved Michigan offense.

My abbreviated thoughts: While Michigan fans will almost assuredly be waking up the ghosts of 1969 when Ohio State rolls into town this fall, the excitement may be quelled a bit by Ohio State's lackluster record heading into the game should this indeed be worst-case scenario season.

So it's a: Probable win, but close to a toss-up. I think Greg Robinson was a gigantic letdown of a hire for Michigan; the third or fourth least sexy hire this side of bringing back Ron English, and I don't think the defense will be anything approaching respectable this year. Add that onto the fact that Rodriguez will be still be working out the kinks of a true freshman quarterback, and I don't think Michigan has the greatest of chances in this game.

Thus, with a win in Ann Arbor, this theoretical Ohio State team finishes the season at 8-4. The Outback bowl, and a chance to redeem the season (and in some small ways, the program) with a New Year's Day victory over an SEC squad, both beckon. Keep in mind this is the worst case scenario*, but that even with Pryor injured, I still think Ohio State ends up in a bowl. The Motor City bowl, perhaps? Who knows. I'd rather not think about it.

But remember: the above prediction is me at my most pessimistic. The loss to Iowa strikes me as a bit of a stretch (sorry BHGP), but hopefully Swingin' Dick Stanzi will prove me wrong by throwing for 800 yards against whatever FCS team Iowa opens against (ed. note: Ha! That last bit was intended a joke, but they really do open up against Eastern Illinois - Tony Romo's alma mater - on the 5th.) To me, worst-case scenario implies an inexplicable loss or two; like, say Purdue in 2004, where some team that finishes 5th or 6th in the Big Ten standings rises up and smacks the good guys with a confusing loss. That would be Illinois in this hellish scenario, actually.

So what do you think? Do you think this worst-case scenario is too pessimistic? Perhaps too optimistic for you world-hating cretins out there? Am I giving someone a short shrift? Or am I giving someone too much benefit of the doubt? Let me know in the comments.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good stuff

I really enjoyed these two categories:
Record vs final top 25 last 5 years:
Record vs winning opponents last 5 years:

Pretty telltale stats about the Big Ten. Good post.

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69

by jtothep on Jul 28, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a tad humbling to see that some of the best teams in the conference

had .500 records against winning competition

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Jul 28, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Worst case scenarios

involve losing to Toledo. Trust me, it happens.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on Jul 28, 2009 1:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Winning record my ass...

they were good. At least Michigan got beat by a shitty Toledo team.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on Jul 28, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think for a "true" Worst-case-scenario

you can’t win any Toss-up games, yet you have OSU beating Wisconsin, which you listed as a toss-up (I probably wouldn’t have called it a toss-up, myself, though, probably a probable win). Granted it is a home game, and maybe you are “splitting” the Wisconsin/Iowa games, but your evaluation is more of a “low expectations scenario” and not so much “worst case”.

Other than that, this is pretty spot on (though as jesse points out, you never know when some up-start comes and beats you, but I don’t see that happening to this OSU team)

by The JuggerNitt on Jul 28, 2009 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

True, but I think any scenario involving us winning less than 6 games

implies the following:

a) an utter offensive collapse
b) an utter defensive collapse
c) Terrelle Pryor’s legs exploding

And as negative as I might be, the only one that even seems feasible is c)

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Jul 28, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Solid work

Ohio State is one of those “good feeling” games I have for Purdue. We’ll probably lose, but I absolutely could see us somehow pulling it out. It’s much different from two years ago when I hoped we could pull it out and you made it obvious our offense could ahve accomplished as much if we had just stayed in the locker room. I got so tired of seeing Jared Armstong punts I left early.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jul 28, 2009 4:41 PM EDT reply actions  

I've just gotta know:

In this sentence – “So I figured that instead of replying to those e-mails directly with the same answer, I’d write up my honest epinion.” – is that a typo, or a new term describing internet opinions?

Either way – pretty hip.

'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'

by Pete the Streak on Jul 28, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

That's a long story

but it stems from the …. interesting… Michigan blog Go Blue Michigan Wolverine , that’s apparently written by third graders, retards, or third-grade retards. The site layout alone should be enough to give you a headache. Other gems: the use of the term “e-blog” and the catchphrase “no sugarcoat”

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Jul 28, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

also forget use of RANDOM capitalized words and HOMOSEXUAL bricklayers. no sugarcoat.

as to e-blog post, i find SAM intangibles OFF THE CHARTS.

by Brodie on Jul 29, 2009 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

LOL@eblog

perhaps they previously had a weblog where they trained spiders to write out posts for them?

by The JuggerNitt on Jul 29, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think you understand the meaning of the term “worst.” It’s completely unfathomable that the Buckeyes lose to Wisconsin? To Michigan? Even, Purdue, who you give a 40% chance of winning?

by sullivti on Jul 29, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

It's not "completely unfathomable"

for the Buckeyes to lose to any of those teams; that’s why I use terms like “probable” and “likely”. I tried to separate the phrase “worst-case scenario” from “apocalyptic meltdown”, because obviously, apocalyptic meltdown entails losing pretty much every game but New Mexico State. But everyone knows this, and it wouldn’t have made for an interesting post.

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Jul 29, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, then you’re not giving a worst-case scenario. If Purdue has a 40% chance of winning, a worst-case scenario would mean the Buckeyes lose.

by sullivti on Jul 29, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Iowa Nitt Pickers?

Shame on you for posting an editor’s note that is so flagrantly false (sorry, it’s my first comment with this site, so I’m being bombastic).
You seem confused, and rightfully so. You have confused Iowa with Paterno’s Pussycats, so let me set you straight. Iowa does not play the easiest OOC in the Big Ten’s history, that’s the Nitts, who open their season with Eastern Illinois (and who will continue to consume so many creampuffs until their meeting with the Hawks that they may still have some white stuff at the edge of their collective mouth).
No, Iowa opens their season on Sept. 5 against the MUCH better (uh… yeah) FCS team (and yearly semifinalist in the post-season playoffs), Northern Iowa. To be fair to the UNI Panthers, they really are a good enough team to be considered Indiana’s superior.
However, you may be entitled to your gaffe, and this is where things get (slightly) interesting. The old Hawkeye QB, Jake Christensen, who fell apart agianst PSU is going to be the starting QB for his new school this fall. He now plays for Eastern Illinois. Eastern Illinois opens next season at Kinnick Stadium, home of Jake’s former team, the Iowa Hawkeyes. He will be competing against Swingin Dick Stanzi (I don’t think I have to explain to PSU fans who HE is) the quarterback who won Jake’s starting position causing him to transfer.
So, on Sept. 5, 2009 we will root for our old QB to take his revenge on PSU, but on Sept. 4, 2010 we will fuck his mom.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Aug 12, 2009 4:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SBN home of Ohio State football and basketball

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

Astronaut_pancakes_small Sam @ WWAHT