Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

Happy Valley indeed

Mea culpa: I didn't really think we had much of a chance. The mismatches seemed to be few and far between, but the one that seemed to matter most - the Buckeye offense versus Penn State's defense - was in Penn State's favor by such a wide margin, I thought it invalidated the overall evenness of the two teams.

I was wrong. And I couldn't be happier about it.

There's so much credit to give to so many different people, I'm not sure where to begin. Who thought we wouldn't turn the ball over once, against one of the ballhawkin'est defenses in the country?  Who thought we'd total 200 yards rushing against far and away the best rushing defense we've played all year? Who thought we'd have any sort of passing game whatsoever?

I imagine a few of you über-homers out there thought we did, but going into this game, what exactly did you base that on, you mad bastards? I submit that it was absolutely nothing, other than mindless faith in your team. Well, you were right this time.

Star-divide

The Good

- First things first: I have to give it up for the playcalling, but can I at least only do it in isolated instances? It's not like anything between the field goal drive and Pryor's first passing TD was revolutionary. What was new and interesting wasn't executed right in the first place. Didn't even look practiced. But outside of that? It was the best-called offensive gameplan since.... Happy Valley 2007. Hey, Penn State, can we trade stadiums?

- This is Terrelle Pryor's signature "Terrelle Pryor" win. He was not amazing. For an entire half, he wasn't even particularly good. But on two out of three instances when Ohio State badly, badly needed him to just be a competent quarterback, he actually did it. Against an excellent defense, no less. He nailed that bomb to Posey perfectly, did an excellent job of hitting his checkdown on Brandon Saine's receiving TD, and he juuuust overshot Sanzenbacher before the half. There were arm punts here and there, but the fact that they didn't land in the hands of some greedy DB has to count as some bit of progress. Overall, I don't think you can deny that he did the best job yet in his young career of "managing the game", as the cliché goes. For once, he didn't force anything. Had those first down drops been brought in by usually-surehanded Devier Posey and Duron Carter, it might have been considered the unquestioned best performance of his career.

- I thought the Ohio State offensive line did an excellent job, considering, in both pass and run pro. Even without JB Shugarts, they made the Penn State front four largely irrelevant for much of the game. I was not expecting Ohio State to gash PSU like they did, and the line played the biggest part. It's not like Herron was having the greatest day seeing the holes that developed, but the Buckeyes were still able to pick up 4-5 yards on the ground consistently enough to take pressure off of Pryor. These guys deserve all the crap they've gotten these past few years, just as much as they deserve the bulk of the credit for today's offensive success.

- The defensive line has completely recovered from the Purdue loss. Cameron Heyward might have made himself a 1st round pick this year with the job he did today. That sucks, but it's tough to deny that he looked like the best player on either team today. I feel like a complete jackass for suggesting he move back to DT over the summer. He's an excellent strongside DE.

- I thought Herron and Saine both finally lived up to the hype, even if it was only in fits and starts. Both looked far quicker against Penn State than they have at any time this year. Hope Herron can get healthy in time for Iowa, but I wouldn't count on it.

- I think it's safe to say Ray Small, while not living up to expectations by any stretch, isn't quite a bust. First, he saves our bacon against Ohio U, and today, his punt returns changed the dynamic of the whole game. I can't help but wonder what might have been if the dude had kept his head straight for his first three years in Columbus.

- I thought Devin Barclay looked calm, cool and collected in such a raucous environment. He's no Mike Nugent, and probably not even Josh Huston, but he came up pretty big in his first road start.

The Bad

I can't believe this, but this is going to be rather short.

- Let's not make Jake Ballard block anybody the rest of the season. Dude just can't do it. Relying on him to stop a DE is like asking a paraplegic to stop a freight train. It's just not fair. 

- Graham Zug getting loose in the secondary so consistently was worrisome. Seemed like he was the only reason Penn State was driving most of the time. Luckily, this was mostly a first half problem, and seemed to get sewn up fine after that.

- I still consider anything-and-short automatic for most teams against our defensive interior. Our DTs are good, but they just can't push the opposing interior back in these critical situations.  Not with any consistency anyway.

The Downright Confusing

- The Wildcat was deployed in the first half at the most confusing time possible, and was appropriately stuffed. It was deployed in the second half, and worked. What? Did Jim Tressel really wait nine games to use this? I suppose this is more ammo for the "he's holding stuff back" crowd, but man, this was shocking. If we're going to use it again, let's put someone back there who might actually be a threat to pass at some point (Posey? Some former high school QB?)

- I don't think Penn State fans repped particularly well at all. Booing their own team, leaving early when the game was still technically in doubt.... not pretty. I'm not enough of a jackass to make any grand proclamations about their "classlessness" or something, but... I was disappointed. For the record, I don't think any fan should ever boo their own team.

- I guess we didn't need it that much in the end, but the lack of play-action is perplexing. Especially when we're running on almost every first down.

If you read the live thread, you'll remember me saying that Purdue changed my entire perspective on this season. Well, this is just as much of a gamechanger. While it doesn't wholly make up for the Purdue loss, it shows us definitively that things are actually trending up, the offense is getting better, and this defense is more than a beneficiary of having played bad offensive teams. Remember that one maxim about Jim Tressel teams always getting better? I'm close to rechristening it The Grand Theory of Ohio State Football in post-Cooper Era. Today was about as much proof as one will ever need. Still, Iowa, even without Ricky Stanzi, will be no slouch, and Michigan is Michigan. Ohio State will have to guard against a letdown in both games. The road to Pasadena is winding, if not particularly long. I guess I can't blame you for smelling roses after today's game. Let's just hope the team isn't quite yet.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Uber-homerness.......perhaps.....

And the fact that PSU’s “D” was overvalued b/c of a horrendously weakass schedule…

I thought we’d definitely have a chance to win, but I did think it might be closer.

HD
Founder
http://blog.BlockONation.com

by BlockONation on Nov 7, 2009 9:13 PM EST reply actions  

Pryor...

I thought Pryor did a decent job, but after a couple of TD’s it looked like he chose not to celebrate with the team, but to go “flash his might” in front of the crowd. I think it was after the second 2 touchdowns… but I’m not positive. I don’t know if that’s what he was really doing, but it was really disconcerting. I thought after the Purdue lost, he was a “changed man.” I don’t know… maybe he is just a diva…

by crevis1987 on Nov 7, 2009 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

Why even bring this up?

Who cares?

My Lord, Buckeye fans are their own worst enemies.

by gahnki on Nov 7, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, this is pretty ridiculous. I’m so tired of all the Pryor bashing by some Buckeyes fans. And even after he plays a good game against Penn St. on an injured ankle some people still are looking for things to complain about.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 8, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not like anything between the field goal drive and Pryor’s first passing TD was revolutionary. What was new and interesting wasn’t executed right in the first place. Didn’t even look practiced.

Plays are not isolated. Running “boring” plays to you may lead to “exciting” plays that end up scoring points.

by gahnki on Nov 7, 2009 10:52 PM EST reply actions  

Plays do not exist in a vacuum; they set up future plays. Running 34 Power for two yards doesn’t mean it was a failure if you keep PSU in an 8-man front and set up a 62 yard touchdown pass. Which is what happened on Terrelle’s touchdown to DP.

by gahnki on Nov 7, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Furthermore, coaches aren’t just responding to what superficially gains yardage; they are responding to personnel, formations, boundary/field considerations, etc. Look at OSU’s use of the bubble screen early in the game. They went with 21 personnel (2 backs, 1 big) and PSU countered by cheating their linebackers towards the “grey-area” outside the box. OSU fired off a bubble to back the linebackers out. It only gained a handful of yards, but when OSU later went to 21 personnel, they now had more space to run.

by gahnki on Nov 7, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right, but it doesn't explain away roughly a quarter-and-a-half of offensive meandering, does it?

We couldn’t really be spending all that time setting up one play, can we?

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Nov 7, 2009 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

No, that likely came from a function of field position and trust issues derived from poor field position. But the right play isn’t always the creative play. Sometimes playing it safe is much smarter when the risk is too great. In the first half, it was at least a close game on the scoreboard, even with it being abundantly clear that PSU couldn’t move the ball. A turnover could possibly endanger a dominating defensive performance.

And we still won 24-7. What is the value of winning by more? An 8-7 win is worth as much for the record as 24-7 or 48-7 would have been.

In fact, one could argue that protecting the odds of victory is more valuable than gaining extraneous points in certain situations.

But this discussion really isn’t meaningful as I understand your original point now, and I agree with it . It would have been nice to have some more breathing room before halftime.

by gahnki on Nov 7, 2009 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

FYI, it has been noted that the winner of Iowa/Ohio St will get the Rose Bowl bid.

Even if OSU beats Iowa and loses vs TTUN, Ohio St would have the tiebreakers vs Iowa, Penn St and Wisconsin. Iowa if they beat OSU and lose to Minnesota, would also have the tiebreakers vs Penn St and Wisconsin.

Essentially the TTUN game means nothing for the Rose Bowl berth, but could affect bowl seedings, includes TTUN’s bowl chances. They most likely will lose at Wisconsin, and if they lose to us, will be staying home at 5-7.

by talonk on Nov 7, 2009 11:38 PM EST reply actions  

The Michigan game may not mean much for OSU after next week, but...

I definitely want to see Tressel push his record to 8-1, and extend the streak to 6 in a row!

HD
Founder
http://blog.BlockONation.com

by BlockONation on Nov 8, 2009 12:15 AM EST reply actions  

Goddamn this feels good.

I think this version of the team, while nowhere near its ceiling, is what a lot of us were hoping would show up. The offense was solid if unspectacular, but most importantly scored touchdowns when put in good field position. Our D was awesome, but I think we’ve known since the USC game that they would be capable of stopping anyone (so while it was great to see them shut down a pretty good offensive team, it wasn’t all that surprising).

If we play like this for the rest of the season (let alone if we continue to improve), we walk through Iowa, pants Michigan, and have a damn good chance to beat our opponent in Pasadena (with Oregon’s loss, I’m not sure who that will be).

by Estrada on Nov 8, 2009 1:19 AM EST reply actions  

Oregon will most likely still win the Pac-10, assuming they bounce back from their hangover game today. I’m guessing that they’ll win out, and get the Rose Bowl bid.

by Simmsinns on Nov 8, 2009 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Pretty amazing that the 4 and 1 that gave PSU the touchdown didn’t turn out to be the game changer. It was in fact the shutout preventer. Game of inches, can’t win on one big play, other generic colloquialism.

by Chief WaDrew on Nov 8, 2009 6:15 AM EST reply actions  

Is Graham Zug the one with GOD’S GIFT tattooed down his triceps?

by Big Boutros on Nov 8, 2009 9:57 AM EST reply actions  

No, that would be TE Andrew Quarless.

"In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."

by IcersGuy on Nov 8, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

If he is God's Gift....

It must be one of those gifts you buy from Spencers…you know the ones….where you get a scratch-off ticket saying you won $100k only to flip it over and see that its a fake…you know…that kinda gift

by BuckeyeSki on Nov 9, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Gradulations, Buckeyes

Dag, that was a dominant beat you put on our lads. Agree on your offensive line surprising: a fine performance against our front seven. Some of what your offense did was against our very best players: the Pryor shrug off of Bowman, the Zach Boren knockdown of Sean Lee and subsequent first down completion, and the Posey blowby of D’anton Lynn on the long catch.

And your defense is every bit as scary as I had feared. Was that Chimdi Chekwa totally removing Derek Moye from our gameplan? I mean, we had no problem identifying Cam Heyward. That was a vintage performance of an attacking defense. Whew, I hope you get an ‘explosive’ offense in the Rose Bowl to showcase this d’s talent.

Anyway, you run a decent blog here Sam. And that was a very fine win. Gradulations.

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69

by jtothep on Nov 9, 2009 12:26 PM EST reply actions  

Nice Write-up Sam

What a game. A ridiculous defensive show. And since when did we learn to throw the bubble screen, and a TE screen (albeit on 3 & 17?), and if my eyes aren’t playing tricks on me, we passed the ball to the fullback….TWICE!

by BuckeyeSki on Nov 9, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

It was so sweet

I watched it again Sunday. Amazing performance by Heyward, starting with the sack on their first offensive play.

I agree that some of the booing was lame, but PSU did also punt with under 5 min left and down 3 scores.

by Big Red Dog on Nov 10, 2009 8:00 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SBN home of Ohio State football and basketball

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

Astronaut_pancakes_small Sam @ WWAHT