Blogpoll Ballot: Week 5
![]() |
||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida | 1 |
| 2 | Alabama | 1 |
| 3 | Texas | |
| 4 | Southern Cal | |
| 5 | Boise State | |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | |
| 7 | LSU | |
| 8 | Ohio State | |
| 9 | TCU | 3 |
| 10 | Cincinnati | 3 |
| 11 | Miami (Florida) | 4 |
| 12 | Iowa | 2 |
| 13 | Penn State | 3 |
| 14 | Oregon | 5 |
| 15 | Oklahoma State | 1 |
| 16 | Auburn | 8 |
| 17 | Kansas | |
| 18 | Oklahoma | 9 |
| 19 | Brigham Young | 2 |
| 20 | Mississippi | 3 |
| 21 | Nebraska | 3 |
| 22 | South Florida | |
| 23 | Missouri | |
| 24 | Georgia Tech | 1 |
| 25 | Wisconsin | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ok, Week 5 has come and gone, and the “good teams” are finally able to prove they are good (relative to preseason) and some of the frauds have shown themselves as well (Cal, Ok St).
Anyways, as an alternative to Sam’s rankings (I don’t have any quibble with them actually), my system is almost without bias. In my formula, teams are given credit for wins (obviously), but they also get credit for going on the road, and not playing the dregs of FBS/FCS.
All conferences are given a factor rating (based on winning percentage and OOC schedule). So playng a Florida is much better than playing a Troy (and playing either of those on the road also benefits greatly).
This ranking is not stagnant, it will change from week to week, based on who they play, and based on the performance of the teams they have already played. For example, Boise St was fairly high in the system until this week when they played UC Davis (FCS). Anything positive from their ranking will take a hit with each loss Oregon accumulates as well.
The only bias I place into the system is the rankings of the teams in each conference. I will adjust for similar records based on head-to-head and OOC schedules. Rarely will I move a 2-2 team ahead of 3-2, but it can happen, especially if the 3-2 team has 2 wins vs FCS schools.
Note: For teams that have played one fewer game, I add a win to their resume (only for above .500 teams), not assuming that they will win the game, but in order to rank teams relative to the number of losses they have accumulated so far (i.e 5-0 = 4-0 for this purpose), but they team with the extra game has the benefit or subtraction of the extra game played, depending on who that team is.
Anyways, here is the Top 25 and Bottom 20:
1. VA Tech 5.01
2. LSU 4.92
3. Texas 4.88
4. Alabama 4.77
5. Miami FL 4.59
6. Auburn 4.47
7. Iowa 4.43
8. Florida 4.28
9. Oregon 4.20
10. Ohio St 4.12
11. USC 4.04
12. Stanford 4.01
13. Notre Dame 3.90
14. Wisconsin 3.88
14. TCU 3.88
16. Arizona 3.87
17. UCLA 3.85
18. Washington 3.74
19. Kansas 3.70
20. Idaho 3.66
21. Nebraska 3.61
22. Georgia 3.59
22. BYU 3.59
22. Boise St 3.59
25. GA Tech 3.53
Next 5: Michigan, West Virginia, Cincinnati, Missouri, Penn St
Bottom 20
101. Western Michigan 1.11
102. Colorado 1.10
103. San Jose St 1.09
104. Duke 1.03
105. Fresno St 0.93
106. Akron 0.80
107. UNLV 0.78
108. Utah St 0.77
109. Memphis 0.64
110. Virginia 0.63
111. Army 0.55
112. FIU 0.49
113. Louisville 0.47
114. FAU 0.45
115. Miami OH 0.27
116. East Michigan -0.24
117. Rice -0.32
118. Western Kentucky -0.44
119. New Mexico -0.60
120. Ball St -0.70
Pac-10 is extremely well represented in your top-25
Is there a mathematical explanation for that?
www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com
Call me crazy
But I don’t think Florida’s as good as they were last year. Maybe it’s the lack of a go-to reciever… maybe it’s a little complacency. But I think they go down to LSU, and then an unexpected loss along the way, too.
But I can’t argue with your poll. Solid.
I can see where you're coming from, and it's probably true
I was expecting the Gators to just plug a guy in as a reasonable facsimile of Percy Harvin, but that’s not happening. Demps and Rainey are dangerous in their own right, but with the loss of Andre Debose, I expected someone (Deonte Thompson?) to step up and fill a good bit of the hole left behind by Harvin. Clearly, that hasn’t happened.
That being said, I’m not sure LSU is as good as their ranking. Should be a very interesting game, as the loss of Tebow might takes the Gators down to LSU’s level, provided that John Brantley is still serviceable.
www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com
What unfortunate is that in the AP and USA Today polls, even if LSU losses they’ll still be ahead of us. But, as a Buckeye fan, I’ve found it’s best not to care about those polls until much later in the season.
If there ever was a season to show how terrible their voting is however, 2009 is it.
This isn’t about being a homer either. Ranking ND purely based on their schedule, ranking Houston for beating Ok. St., ranking Cal because of 1 player… the list could go on.
Where are they now?
They don’t rank them based on which they think are the best, they rank them to sell magazines, get website views, and hype otherwise boring blowout games.
I’m with you on most of this. But I don’t even care who they think is best or who would do what in some hypothetical matchup.
That’s why I love what Doug Lesmerises is doing. The only thing that matters is the games played. Look at the resume of who each team has played and beat- this year- and be done with it. The rankings should be a reflection of what has happened in College Football this year, not projections on what they think will happen.
So while I agree with you that ND had no place in the polls just because people thought they could have a good record against an easy schedule- Houston absolutely deserved to be in the top 25- if not the top 5- after beating Oklahoma State and Texas Tech. Who had a more impressive start to the season? Drop them out of the polls if you want after losing to a bad UTEP team, but don’t rank Florida ahead of them just because you think eventually Houston will lose or that Florida would beat them in some hypothetical head to head matchup.
Oh, and here is Doug’s ballot for this week: http://www.cleveland.com/buckeyeblog/index.ssf/2009/10/doug_lesmerises_top_25_ap_ball.html

by 
1
1




