Just Golden
Touchdown passes are good for the soul. They're also good for sophomore quarterbacks who had yet to prove they could play consistent football against a live, non-MAC, non-Illinois defense. Terrelle Pryor was far from perfect today, but if you watched the game, you couldn't help but feel good. Yes, there were blown coverages. But there had been blown coverages before this season, and Terrelle couldn't hit the gloriously open man to save his life. Today, he did, and as sad as it may be, that's most of the progress I was looking for.
The first half was a tad agonizing, to put it lightly. The Ohio State offense was just misfiring, rather than out-and-out failing to establishing anything resembling a consistent drive. DeVier Posey dropped two touchdown passes. The offensive line looked lost, though it didn't feel like anything new. The defense was inches away from forcing Minnesota into three-and-outs, just like it was against Purdue for 90 percent of the game. In the comment thread, I noted:
Seems like the offense is more misfiring than anything else today, rather than out-and-out failing to achieve anything resembling consistency. I know how this sounds, but we’re inches away from 28-0 and next-to-no complaining from the peanut gallery. Two dropped TD passes, and a third that was just thrown behind the receiver and picked off. We’re sustaining drives, Pryor is hitting open men, he’s running when nothing else is available, and Saine looked good before the injury (concussion?).
In the second half, the agony would mercifully end.
For the first time this season, it actually felt like the miscues from the first half were corrected and produced noticed results in the second half. Posey's case of the dropsies? Gone. Offensive line? Vaguely competent. Defensive line, which was decidely lackluster in the first and second stanzas? Reinvigorated. It was a bit shocking, given that this coaching staff's calling card lately has been bashing its head into walls until they break. The stark difference between the halves? It's tough to deny that lot of it resulted from coaching. While we won't be eating crow about the offensive staff anytime soon since it's Minnesota, it would be shortsighted to not give the staff credit; yes, even Bollman and Siciliano.
The Good
- Terrelle Pryor finally earned his way into this category today. The stats aren't all that sexy: 13 for 25, 239 yards, two touchdowns, and one pick that would have been a touchdown if it had been better placed. In another first for this season, Pryor ran with confidence (!) and, after the first half, was fully willing to absorb hits if it meant extra yardage. Not to sound like a complete blowhard, but can anyone deny he played angry today? Excellent performance, and just what he needed to bounce back from Purdue. Also awesome? 104 yards on the ground at a 7 yards-per-carry clip.
- Jordan Hall. When Saine went down with an injury in the 2nd, I'll admit, I started dialing up the local noose store, just to see if they shipped in bulk. Either Ohio State was going to burn Berry's redshirt and risk further injury, or Jordan Hall was going to have to manbeast his way into full-time, every down status. I had completely forgotten about one Jermil Martin, but more on that in a minute. Hall looks excellent for a freshman, and I've already thought up a nickname: "Baby 'Tonio", as in Antonio Pittman, who he's looking more and more like with each carry.
- Speaking of baby running backs, how about Jermil Martin? His long TD run was Beanie-esque, bowling over defenders and dragging fools into the end zone. I half-expected him to get up and rip his jersey in two, but he didn't. I'm still praying to gods I don't even believe in that Saine is fine, but it isn't the end of the world if he's out for next week.
- I can't go without mentioning Posey, of course: 8 catches, 161 yards, two touchdowns. Two dropped score prevented him from having the mother of all monster days, but as the object of Pryor's stare-down desire, he's doing quite well for himself.
- Welcome back to the category, defensive line, though you technically didn't go anywhere since I was too busy ranting after Purdue to categorize your performance. Five sacks on the day was excellent, especially considering two of them came against the annoyingly-elusive Marqueis Gray.
The Bad
Well, not a whole lot was legitimately bad, but there were some minor issues that better teams than Minnesota will take advantage of.
- Aaron Pettrey. His struggles continued, but were prettied up a bit by a late, long field goal to make it 38-0. Why is he missing short-yardage field goals? The first was from a tough angle, granted, but he was automatic in '06 from almost any distance. He was supplanted last year due to Pretorius' strong leg, not because the South African Sensation was particularly accurate. Wazzup?
- This is a stretch, but I was a little surprised by the intermittent success Minnesota had on the ground. As the conference's worst rushing offense, I didn't expect them to get over 75 yards. Instead, they had the best day on the ground of any Ohio State opponent all year, exceeding Wisconsin and USC's mark of 118 yards by five. I'm not sure what to think. I could chalk it up to the front seven having a bit of an off day in that respect, but I hope the team doesn't. There are a few things to work on before the trip to Happy Valley.
- I don't think the secondary had the best day. Most of Weber's incompletions resulted directly from enormous pressure from the DL. Back-up Marqueis Gray had a surprising amount of success through the air and on the ground, making DBs miss and forcing them to bite hard on a few different play-action passes. They were by no means awful in holding Minnesota to 163 yards through the air, but a better quarterback will make Ohio State pay if it fails to bring enough pressure, just as Joey Elliot did.
- Perhaps Tim Brewster will fall back on the "getting our offense some late-game practice excuse", but scoring a TD against the back-ups to prevent the shutout was lame.
The Downright Confusing
- Well, at least the offensive line didn't make the bad category again, as its play improved after the first drive. Pryor was only sacked once, and the OL directly benefited image-wise from Pryor making far better decisions under pressure than he did in West Lafayette. All that said, they opened some gaping holes for Martin and Hall, and outside of "False Starts" JB Shugarts, they trimmed down on the penalties.
- Is it some sort of ritual for Minnesota kick returners to muff the kickoff? How many different times did that happen today?
- Coleman's missed tackle on Gray's 25 yard-run in the first quarter was surprising, but he redeemed himself on yet another brilliant pick.
While this wasn't quite the perfect way to bounce back from Purdue, I think both units got a good bit of confidence playing a Minnesota team that, in the end, might not be as good as its record indicates. Most importantly, Pryor gave his critics plenty of crow in showing that he can be terrific when he puts it all together. While I don't think he needs any more confidence (dude is downright arrogant at times, which is fine, as long as he backs it up), a game or two to get his head right is just what this team as a whole needs. This was an excellent start. While New Mexico State won't mean jack for Happy Valley, another good game under his belt may slow the game down for him just enough to keep the Buckeyes mighty competitive on November 7th .
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Offensive Line young and improving
You have a very talented lie with uoside potential no writer has recognized.
Shugarts has a false start with lean on a 3rd and long pass play, just one for the team today.
Brewster, Shugarts, Browning, Justin Boren all played great today, Cordle had some smart plays but had too many missed pick ups on the zone blitz.
Given Shugarts, Boren, Brewster are all under classman and with ADAMS to improve over the next year, the line will be ont of the best in Football.
Browning is playing the best right now, not Boren. Browning had a great game and was a force. With that Shugarts played a notable game. several pancakes when the blocking scheme does not allow for many.
Boren was best too many times for his talent and I believe that is the issue with Cordle. I love the guys leadership but he is not a tackle.
Miller was back in there looking tough and I would say he should start downthe stretch.
For the life of my and 33 years in football consulting, why are they switching people in when guys are doing well and are still in the early “live game” learnig situation. Players need to play in games with the speed and the consequenses of poor play motivating them.
Take shugarts out again and I willbe on the boards with the rest calling for Bollmans head.
Give these young ones the time and supports toleads your team to another big one in the next two years.
Alsaobring in a coach that can scheme and offense to take advantage of the talented Pryor. Get him out of the pocket and wait until the backs start moving up during the game fearing the runand then let it fly.
by woodyherman on Oct 24, 2009 4:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was at the game today. As you said, the first half was both very good (because we move the ball so well) and very frustrating (in that we didn’t get many points). On Pryor’s pick before halftime he had a reciever (I think it was Sanzanbacher) wide open on the right but didn’t even look that way. He stared down Posey the whole time, so the DB was able to read his eyes and intercept the pass. Once Pryor sees that coverage he needs to look to the other side and he would have had an easy TD (I know, that’s easy to say from the stands, but he can’t lock on one receiver like that).
It was good to see them take advantage of the turnovers in the second half. That’s something they weren’t able to do the past couple weeks offensively. I thought Jordan Hall ran very well in the second half. Also, I can’t believe that Jermil Martin scored on that long TD run. From the stands he looked like he was running sooooo slow and I was expecting a DB to catch up with him, but they never did. I consider myself a pretty big Buckeyes fan but I had never heard of that kid before today — is he a true freshman? I thought Hall and Berry were our only freshman RB’s.
Minnesota’s offense is just terrible when you take away Decker. One player that did impress me from their defense was the DB Marcus Sherels. He was making plays all over the field today. He broke up at least two passes in the end zone (which you might have called drops but I thought he got a hand in on those plays). Of course, he may have also been responsible for letting Posey get so wide open twice, but he was making some big plays for them.
by Buckeye Brad on Oct 24, 2009 6:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually, that INT was thrown in Sanzo's direction
So it must have been Posey open in the other end.
www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com
by Sam @ WWAHT on Oct 24, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I must have had them mixed up.
by Buckeye Brad on Oct 24, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jermil Martin
I, too, was surprised by Jermil Martin’s play. Grant it, it was against Minnesota, but the guy looked strong. He is a red-shirt freshman from Glenville HS in Cleveland, OH. I’m thinking Glenville HS puts out some studs (i.e. Troy Smith, Ted Ginn Jr.). I’m from the Glenville area and remember hearing about him in high school, but more about him as a defensive end. Glad to see he can run. He’s something around 6’0" and 225lbs. Hopefully we start utilizing him a little more since our running game is definitely needing with Saine and Herron hurt. Go Bucks!!!
by jharbdo on Oct 24, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This was another lackluster effort, but against a horrible opponent. This team had an edge when it played USC. I don’t see that edge now. The one play that was encouraging was the Posey drop on the bomb. TP laid that ball in like a pro into tight coverage.
by elsandito on Oct 24, 2009 10:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree. We were heartbroken after the USC game and are still suffering, but it’s time to focus on the positives. Hopefully, an identity is starting to emerge. That was a beautiful ball thrown by TP and I even saw him throw a ball away today instead of taking a sack! That was a drastic improvement.
We were stalling in the red zone again, but I did see some improvement. Tressel went for it on 4th down (it still resulted in a FG, but at least he went for it!). We have one more week to get our stuff together with New Mexico State, before we really get tested. The line really needs to find an identity and mesh. Its tough with the injuries and position shuffling, but someone needs to step up. It’s sad to say, but hopefully the loss to Purdue was humbling and these guys finally realized there is a lot to be worked on before you can just go out and expect opponents to roll over.
I heard a lot of talk about TP realizing he needs to improve his relationship with his teammates, which is relieving. I feel that should have been a given, but if a loss to Purdue is what it takes, then so be it. We can still earn a share of the Big Ten Championship, but they have to go out there and take it.
How bout the pro set with TP roll out? It was ran several times and worked pretty well.
by jharbdo on Oct 25, 2009 12:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
playcalling was great saturday.
a lot more wrinkles and “college” plays. much different than the style of football we’ve seen for most of the season. apparently there’s a reason behind that.
my friend lives in a dorm with a frosh D-tackle who said the coaches have a special gameplan for pryor for the rest of the season. the first half will be mostly pro-style offensive playcalling which addresses the thing everyone has been fussing about all week. the second half will feature more plays suited to pryor’s strengths—rollouts, options, designed runs, bootlegs, spread passing…
after re-watching the game, it’s hard to disagree that that’s the case but i’m still skeptical. the next few games will reveal more so i’m going to be watching closely to see if that holds any water.
by GrooveLeg on Oct 26, 2009 9:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s probably true; but I think the real question is whether or not they’ll stick with this game plan if things are going poorly against PSU (or Iowa, or scUM for that matter).
by Estrada on Oct 26, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny, I called for that last week (or maybe the week before) in one of the post game threads, only I had it in reverse.
I had called for the options. runs, etc in the first half, where we could get the lead in the first half, then work on the pro-style offense in the second half.
But whatever works, is fine with me.
by talonk on Oct 26, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






