We Will Always Have Tempe: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Tresselball: With a Vengeance

It's baaaaaaaaaaack. But did it ever really go anywhere? The definition of Tressellball has undergone numerous revisions throughout Jim Tressel's tenure in Columbus: first, it was strictly about having a ball-control offense. In 2002, the classic definition of Tresselball emerged: ball-control was still the be-all end-all, but excellent special teams and bend-but-don't break defense became the critical component in a system that prides itself on small margins-of-error. This style of play continued mostly unabated until the latter half of 2005 and all of 2006, when Troy Smith finally came into his own as a passer. While "ball-control" was still important, it was not the end-game of the offense; scoring points was, and that's how it should be with four future first-day WRs on the roster.  In 2007 and 2008, things seemed to return to form, but the traditionally excellent special teams seemed to miss a step, and while the defense remained stout through '07 and most of '08, the offense began to fall below even minimum acceptable levels for Jim Tressel. Jim Tressel doesn't set his standards very high for the offense; he talks up the dream "250 through the air, 200 on the ground" scenario but if he doesn't get it, I don't think he minds, as long as he wins.

Since the USC game, I and others have documented a marked change in the offensive philosophy, especially in the latter stages of triplet blowouts against Indiana, Illinois and Toledo. Ohio State was still passing in the fourth quarter, which is a thing absolutely unheard of in the Jim Tressel system. Moreover, Ohio State seemed to be taking the field each time with an intention to score; you may think that seems like a pointless decision, but if you've watched Ohio State while away countless fourth quarters with three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-punt, you'd know that's a rather shocking departure from the norm.

Well, today, that wasn't working. Vintage 2002/2003 Tresseball - anemic offense intact - won the day today.  I mean it: outside of precisely one 88-yard drive before the half, the offense didn't click. At all. Most of it, unfortunately, is on the shoulders of one Terrelle Pryor, who at no point looked comfortable. In fact, he frequently looked like Craig Krenzel, before Krazy Legs grew a set and essentially willed his team to a championship. Ladies and gentlemen: I think it's time we start revising down our expectations. Terrelle Pryor is not, and, barring multiple miracles, will never be Troy Smith. Let's proceed from here.

Star-divide

The Good

- First up, hats off to the entire damn defense. I know the numbers aren't the sexiest: 368 yards of offense for Wisconsin, 118 rushing (99 yards below their season average, btw) 250 passing, but they in no way tell the story. With the offense struggling mightily, the entire front seven got no rest, and got quite a workout during twin pick sixes by Hines and Coleman. Nevertheless, they were relentless: they notched six sacks on the day, forced two picks, and bottled up Badger wrecking ball John Clay, who toted the rock 20 times for 59 yards. The Badgers had a long run of 15 yards, and it was on an end around to speedster David Gilreath. Said end around plagued us in the first half, but they adjusted and shut it down the next time it was deployed. 

- When you give up 250 yards passing, it's hard to have many laudatory things to say about the secondary. But Kurt Coleman and Jer "Alpha"male Hines (name credit to commenter Big Red Dog) deserve special mention for those critical pick sixes. Coleman's was beautiful, while Hines was majestic - tipping the ball to himself, and then having the fabled "presence of mind" to weave through tacklers for the score. Both players were terrific in run support as well.

- The special teams were, obviously solid; Pettrey got out of his, while The Ghost of Ray Small (HT: 11W) showcased the quicks that made us so excited about him. 

The Bad

Uh, where to start?

- Terrelle Pryor. Buddy, I told myself I'd keep you out of this category for my own sanity until you were actively awful, and uh, yeah:

 Ohio St. Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int 
 T. Pryor 5 13 87 38.5 6.7 2 16 1 1

 

Add onto that just 8 yards rushing outside of an admittedly good late 2nd-quarter 27-yd run, and....

Pryor, your game! WOOF!

I have no idea what to make of this. Yes, we saw some progress after USC. Yes, he's "only a sophomore" (though that excuse should have been in its death throes weeks ago). Yes, Wisconsin's defense is  okay, I guess, but let's be honest here: he pulls this against Iowa, Penn State, or even Michigan? We won't stand a chance. Because of this, I feel it is my personal responsiblity to say this: start revising down your expectations. He's never going to be Troy Smith. Right now, he's not even Tyrod Taylor. If he ever gets to the point where we can count on him for 200 yards passing, and about 50 rushing (assuming the RBs are competent and also producing), I think we should be very, very thankful.

- The offensive line. Weeks of progress dissipated against a Wisconsin front that - and let's be honest here - is at the very most above-average. They had given up 100+ yards to two opponents, 200+ yards to one (though, to be fair, that was on 55 carries, but it was against Wofford), and hadn't really started coming together until games against MSU and Minnesota - two of the league's worst rushing offenses. There really isn't any excuse for Ohio State to fail to get at least one back over 100 yards, especially after all the improvements that had been made in the weeks prior. But they didn't even come close.

- But that isn't all on the line. Daniel Herron and Brandon Saine weren't seeing the few holes that there were, and thus, couldn't pace the offense like we need them to.

- If it's true that Jim Tressel exclusively calls plays in the red zone, as the announcers alleged, I think we've found (or perhaps rediscovered) our problem. There were a few brilliant calls today - the Pryor TD pass and the ridiculous misdirection that Saine nearly took the house - and both occured outside the red zone. I don't think it's particularly controversial to assume Hazell had some hand in both, if he didn't outright call the plays in the first place. Another offensive outing like this, especially in one of our critical last three games, and the calls for Tressel to cede playcalling duties will be nothing short a deafening roar.

The Downright Confusing

Not much to speak of here, outside of some officiating mistakes:

  • What was with the game clock management? No time was burned away for two kickoff returns plus a field goal, and with the game still vaguely in doubt, these sorts of mistakes can lead to, well, awkard situations like that two-minute draining of the clock while everyone just sorta stood around. It helped the Ohio State defense catch its breath, so I can't complain too much, but I've never seen something as elementary as the game clock get butchered like that.
  • This is some slight nitpicking, but that late intentional grounding call on Pryor was rather ticky-tack. It still resulted in a field goal, but if it were in a much more critical situation, the outrage emanating from Columbus would have scorched the sky (and probably the earth as well)
  • Where was Duron Carter? I know there isn't a lot of wealth to be spread around when you complete 5 passes, but I was hoping for a bit more from him.

In closing, I'd like to reiterate something about "youth". This is, to be sure, a "young" team, with five seniors starting (Cordle, who hasn't even played for the past few weeks, Coleman, Worthington, Amos, and Ballard). There are a couple older guys sprinkled in as backups - Denlinger, Russell, come to mind - but overall, we're watching juniors, sophomores, and a few freshmen. So what does that all mean, Basil? Well, let's thing about what youth connotates. "Young" does not necessarily mean "bad", what it really usually means is "prone to inconsistency, volatility and massive swings in production". That's what we're getting with this offense, and a lot of it's on Pryor, but putting it all on him is cheating the rest of the unit of its own responsibilities. The running backs have to recapture the consistency they provided against Illinois and Indiana, while the wide receivers have to learn to adjust to their QB's numerous deficiencies - they've got to break off routes and keep the passes simpler for him, because right now, he's not going to diagnose coverages. He's going to look for the open man, and when he doesn't feel like doing that, he's going to stare a guy (usually DeVier Posey) down until he comes open. That's just his style right now. If that means we have a moral obligation to beat Nick Siciliano with a tire iron, then so be it, and since the staff clearly can't change how Pryor is playing as easily as we'd hoped, they've got to adjust. The offense itself has a lot to learn, and they don't have that much time to do it before things start getting real. It's looking like these next few games will be almost as crucial as that final stretch.

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Pryor...

I’m glad people are realizing Pryor might not be the best Qb in OSU history. Some of my family members are so high on Pryor the sheer mention of him having a bad play gets them defenseless. Pryor was downright awful today, and he hasn’t been too impressive thus far this season. If he isn’t even going to use his legs and run the ball, we might as well put in Bauserman… I’m sure he can throw better than Pryor…

by crevis1987 on Oct 10, 2009 9:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Switch TP to WR

and cut your losses short. This defense is for real and Pryor is really holding us down. I still think he’s an NFL player, just not at QB…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk

by hibachi on Oct 10, 2009 9:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

to clarify. i agree that pryor won't play QB in the NFL

but he should be our QB as long as he’s at school. his style works in college and he’ll get better, but not good enough to play QB against NFL defenses.

by GrooveLeg on Oct 12, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just want to say I don't agree with the last two posts at all.

Bauserman is a completely unknown quantity, Pryor would totally lose any and all confidence with a position switch, and a pocket passer is exactly what this offensive line doesn’t need.

We just have to live with Pryor’s inefficiency right now, and hope for improvement. Anything else would be knee-jerk reactionism and would definitely hurt the team. Fortunately, our head coach is not a head case, and he knows this already.

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Oct 10, 2009 9:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree that switching him to WR isn’t the right move- yet. Though I think he ends up there in some capacity even before he leaves Ohio St.

Thought you would like this quote from Tressel:

“I think you have to evaluate every play individually,” Ohio State coach Jim Tressel said. "Do what the critics say have much credence? I don’t know, I guess it’s their opinion. I think you have to go back and watch a guy’s footwork, go watch a guy’s decision-making, watch a guy’s – what he does in the aspect of the play that you’re asking him to do.

“I go back to that last drive of the first half and he was storming down the field, whether it was run, pass or whatever, and what we need to do is do that every drive … I guess.”

emphasis mine.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 10, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I know Tressel knows it

I’m just not sure whether he has the staff in place to actually correct it. As it stands, it’s hard to have faith in Siciliano, as his mentor Daniels never could figure out Boeckman’s footwork.

Now I’m no talent scout, but when I actually bothered to pay attention to Pryor’s feet today, it wasn’t pretty. But perhaps I just expect it now.

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Oct 10, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And this was after an entire off season- when I thought this would get a lot better.

Between his feet and his inability to keep his eyes down field, I just don’t know if it will ever click for him. That’s why I think a position switch- at least partially- is in order eventually.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 10, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm starting to come to the opinion that we might need some new blood at QB coach

I mean, how can we say Siciliano has been anything short of an absolute disaster?

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Oct 10, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who cares about Pryors confidence at this point?

The offense is terrible and without such a strong defense/special teams performance we probably lose this game. You can’t keep sacrificing your team’s performance just so a “star” player doesn’t lose his confidence. I’m sure Bauserman isn’t a star but could the offense really be any worse with him under center than it is right now?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk

by hibachi on Oct 11, 2009 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

without such a strong defense/special teams performance we probably lose this game.

Without the sun, we’d probably be really cold.

Let’s accept that our strengths are with the D and special teams. That’s what this team is.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 11, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

cmon guys, you can say the he’s just a sophmore argument has been exhausted, but lets not compare him to Troy Smith. Troy Smith didn’t even play until his third year at Ohio State (I believe he redshirted in 2002). While Pryor is not looking like a sure-fire NFL QB, he definently has the tools to dominate at the college level. He came in with such a ridiculus amount of hype people its no surprise he’s been a bit of a disappointment so far. Lets keep it in perspective, not start clamoring for a postition switch.

by iwearmocs on Oct 11, 2009 2:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why do you have any faith in him improving next year

when he didn’t improve at all this year? He’s regressed if anything. That pick was one of the worst throws I’ve ever seen…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk

by hibachi on Oct 11, 2009 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pryor's game

I don’t think it’s the right decision to bench him after that game. He did get off to a horrible start but then he actually did run the 2 minute drill at the end of the first half. That’s something that improved, anyway.

Then the second half was just weird with OSU not getting the ball until almost the fourth quarter, but having a big lead when they did get it. The only bad things I remember from Pryor in the 2nd half were losing his helmet and the intentional grounding, neither of which really hurt.

Wisconsin wasn’t the little sisters of the poor, They had good coverage on the receivers, even on the touchdown, and they had that one defensive end that could bring pressure.

Pryor has a huge amount of talent. I think a lot of it would be wasted at wide receiver. He just needs to eliminate a few bad plays a game. I think he’s just trying too hard and needs to relax. Maybe he could use a hypnotist or a sports psychologist.

by Big Red Dog on Oct 11, 2009 11:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is some slight nitpicking, but that late intentional grounding call on Pryor was rather ticky-tack.

I didn’t see any of the game, but I’m curious how a grounding call can be considered ‘ticky-tack’. Not trying to sound like a smartass or anything, maybe I’m not considering something, but you’re either out of the pocket or you aren’t, and you hit the first down marker or you don’t, right?

BSD

by Kevin HD on Oct 11, 2009 5:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The question wasn't so much whether he was outside the box/threw it past the LOS

But whether or not he actually intended to throw at all. Looked to me like he fumbled the ball OOB. But I haven’t looked at it since it happened.

www.wewillalwayshavetempe.com

by Sam @ WWAHT on Oct 11, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

from where i was sitting it looked like the ball went backward

so i would say fumble too… either way, the outcome is pretty much identical. loss of down, loss of yards, punt. the problem was he could have picked up yards if he turned the ball upfield, which i’m yet to see him actually do.

by GrooveLeg on Oct 12, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just some thoughts on what i'd like pryor to improve on before the season ends.

i wanted to see a few conference games before i made this post, so i’ve had time to make sure these weren’t knee-jerk reactions.

- throwing the deep ball: i don’t mean hitting receivers in stride on a corner or post route, i mean throwing 30 to 40 yards downfield to receivers in single coverage on fly and go routes. 50/50 balls are a staple of the college passing game and i counted 4 opportunities where pryor had a guy downfield in single coverage with time to step up and throw (there may have been more). so far, all the defenses we play keep their safeties pretty close to the LOS. if we start throwing the ball downfield, and connecting on a few, they will drop them back and give us more room to run the ball and throw over the middle. todd boeckmann did a great job of this 2 years ago before that awful wisconsin game ruined him for life. pryor has the arm strength, but he gets happy feet and hesitates to the point where it becomes a missed opportunity. more on that later.

- run north and south: pryor has the speed to beat just about anybody to the corner, which is how he picks up a lot of his rushing yards. however, there have been several instances this season in which pryor could have picked up more yards running toward the goal line, when instead he took off for the sideline. this seems to be a mental thing, but for all i know, the coaches have instructed him to take off for the sidelines. i’m not just talking about scrambling either. watch him—he is so concerned with getting out of bounds that he doesn’t realize how many more yards he could pick up by taking on a few defenders.

- bring his throws down: he just throws high a lot. again, maybe this is something the coaches have told him to do, but he could really hang his receivers out to dry by doing that too much. if he catches more of his receivers in stride on short routes, there’s a chance for them to extend the play and get more yards. duh…

- have more confidence: i can’t figure it out, but pryor doesn’t seem to have a swagger at all. i don’t know if he doesn’t trust his o-line (can you blame him?) or his pre-snap reads, but he looks like he’s scared to death out there a lot. now granted, there are times where he owns the field, but he didn’t look like it against wisco. this plays into the deep ball comment as well as the north/south comment—he just needs to be confident in his abilities. one thing i loved about troy smith was that he overflowed with confidence. if he saw a guy in 1-on-1, he tossed it up without hesitation. it’s that kind of "grip-it-and-rip-it" mentality that is the difference between good QBs and great QBs. he definitely has the tools to be great, he just needs to believe that he can be great.

i don’t feel like this is too much to ask of a true sophomore QB. i’m not asking him to correct the glaring inconsistencies in his mechanics or even make better pre-snap reads—those kinds of things take time and coaching. these things i’m talking about are things you can tell your QB in practice just to get him thinking a little bit differently. he does a lot of things well already, but if he can consistently start doing just one of the first two things i mention, he can change my opinion of him drastically.

by GrooveLeg on Oct 12, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This coming from a Tennessee fan who doesnt really care about the bucks...

i really think pryor needs to be switched to WR. He has all the skills ( 6’6’’ and a 4.3 40?!) and weve seen him catch (fiesta bowl last year-td grab). He can certainly do it, and thats the only way he plays at the next level. From what I have seen, OSU wants to run the pro style offense, but with pryor at the helm it cannot work. There is no way in hell pryor can play quarterback in the nfl; mechanics suck, and i have not been impressed with his decisions or his throws. That said, he is a great player, and yall are wastin him by playin him at qb

by cincyvol6198 on Oct 12, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SBN home of Ohio State football and basketball
Start posting about the Buckeyes »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Tennessee running back Bryce Brown (11) runs past Ohio's Melvin Payne (55), Dak Notestine (51) and Lee Renfro (32) during the first half of an NCAA college football game Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009 in Knoxville, Tenn. Tennessee won 34-23. (AP Photo/Wade Payne) +1 updates

Bryce Brown Leaving Tennessee? Former 5-Star RB 'Not A Part Of The Team'

Ohio State head coach Jim Tressel, left, jokes with offensive lineman Bryant Browning (70) before taking the team picture during an NCAA college football media day, Thursday, Aug,13, 2009, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Terry Gilliam)

Jim Tressel Receives Two-Year Contract Extension, No Raise

The offensive line is reflected in the visor of Wisconsin running back John Clay during the second half of an NCAA football game against Michigan, Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009, in Madison, Wis. (AP Photo/Morry Gash) link

Wisconsin RB John Clay Will Miss Entire Spring Season

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Shane350x526_small Sam @ WWAHT

Official Partner of CBS Sports